Many factors need to end up being contemplated when deciding if Shylock is usually to be considered a victim or a villain. It really is difficult to school Shylock as just a victim or villain as he's a complex figure who could be interpreted in different ways.
Anti Semitism was normal in Shakespeares period; therefore a Shakespearian target audience would include regarded Shylock as a villain. In this era usury was condemned by the Christian faith. this intended he was portrayed unsympathetically. This contrasts with modern day values, as we would expect a far more even handed approach
Shakespeare wanted showing Shylock as a villain, in action I picture iii we observe his usury. It really is in this picture, that Bassanio asks to borrow funds in Antonios brand. In the aside we observe Shylocks intent regarding Antonios life EASILY can capture him once after the hip I'll feed fat the historic grudge I bear him. That is concealed under a faade of friendship; he phone calls the relationship a merry sport. Antonio regards the pound of flesh clause to become a express of friendship: The Hebrew will flip Christian: he grows kind. Antonio receives the conditions of the bond because he's confident he will manage to repay the bond. Shylock feels justified in exacting revenge after Antonio. He's resentful of the Christians and their frame of mind towards the Jewish religious beliefs.
In Act 4 scene 1 Shylock is definitely represented as a villain, he needs his pound of flesh and renders no mercy. The judge is certainly biased towards Antonio and it could be